Design Sojourn | Strategic Industrial Design Blog

A warm welcome to you dear reader! If you have not already, why not subscribe to my RSS feed, or get my latest thoughts on Industrial Design in your Email Inbox for free?

Thanks for visiting and please keep in touch? ~ D.T.

All images from HaiShang Design. (Click for a larger image)

It is about time someone designed one that has totally broken the traditional configuration of a Dump Truck! It is really impressive how this designer re-thought how one would operate, and then used that insight to designed a break-through product. Absolutely amazing concept, and sure sign of the amazing pedigree of Chinese designers to come.

Munich-based truck maker F.X. Meiller GmbH & Co KG has seen the future of construction hauling, and it is a sleek all-wheel drive tipper capable of dumping on all four directions.

Chinese transportation designer Haishan Deng created a series of concept drawings depicting what Meiller’s new “super tipper” truck in action that won him a 2007 red dot award for product design from Germany’s Design Zentrum Nordrhein Westfalen, an institution formed in 1955 to promote industrial design aesthetics. Inspired by the movement of quadruped animals, Deng designed the super tipper with independent suspension arms that absorb uneven terrain better than conventional dump trucks.

No word yet on when Meiller plans to build these tippers or how much they will cost, but Deng says the truck’s six engines and battery system will be the priciest parts. A scaled-down prototype is scheduled to be on display May 17-20 in New York at the International Contemporary Furniture Fair.

All images from HaiShang Design. (Click for a larger image)

All images from HaiShang Design. (Click for a larger image)

All images from HaiShang Design. (Click for a larger image)

All images from HaiShang Design. (Click for a larger image)

All images from HaiShang Design. (Click for a larger image)

All images from HaiShang Design. (Click for a larger image)

Via: Scientific American

Image: Poop Hat from Jbox

So where was I? Ah yes.

On two separate occasions, I had a similar discussion with two designer friends. One of which was a very senior designer almost two decades older than I. We were discussing how designers have “Use by Dates” and how we all will eventually get there. This is because the older designers would eventually get surpassed by new blood that has access to new training, technologies, skills and thinking.

So I pondered: “How can designers remain relevant in today’s fast pace design world?”

For one, designers, especially in the senior levels, should not forget how to do actual designing. A few years ago, I spoke to a design educator friend that researched on how a number of design managers and above don’t actually do much design work these days. It seems the higher up you go, the further you get from the day to day design work.

This is true to a certain extent, but from my view, staying hands-on and relevant is something that I have always been very vehement about. Even if I don’t have the time to design at work as I’m spending time on strategy or management, I would spend my free time producing my own design projects instead. Designers on all levels should never forget about their core assets in design.

More importantly, what about that new Thinking bit?

My answer came from a friend who is currently doing his MBA at INSEAD. He shared with me a Toyota case study he worked on in his innovation management class. Apparently Toyota’s manufacturing line is an open book. They frequently invite engineers from their competitors to visit, stay and learn how they are able to be the world’s number 1 car company in quality and reliability. They believe in sharing their advanced techniques, thinking and management philosophy with others, even competitors, as they feel that by sharing they will make the world a better place to live in.

As the story goes, a group of engineers from a competing car company went to Toyota to learn their techniques so that they could apply it on their own production line. When they returned, not only could they not repeat or emulate Toyota’s quality and efficacy controls, they could not even improve their own production process!

Unperturbed, the management from the competing car company did the reverse. They invited Toyota engineers to come and see what they could do to improve their own line. The result was a tremendous success, the Toyota engineers manage to hit double digit percentage improvements on a manufacturing line that was believed impossible to improve.

So what is the moral of this story?

I believe Toyota really understands that even if they share and teach the world their thinking, at the end of the day, it is the Toyota’s culture of excellence and their engineer’s mindset that can never be copied, recreated or reproduced.

Eventually, Toyota will get surpassed as someone will figure out how to do it better. However, Toyota’s culture of sharing actually forces them not to rest on their laurels. This means they will always be ahead of the competitive curve, as they will always be re-inventing themselves with the aim to do their very best!

This is the secret right here.

As time goes on and we get older, the 60-80 hour week is just not going to cut it anymore. However to survive, we will need to continue to stay relevant by constantly reinventing ourselves. We need to identify our strengths, cover our weaknesses and be open to learning new skills. Furthermore do not be afraid to share your experiences, so that you would be always on your toes and out of your comfort zone. This will keep you moving on to the next level and ahead of your competition.

And that was also how my senior designer friend remains extremely relevant in today’s fast pace Internet driven environment.

So csven and I were doing our usual “ping-pong” discussion on Twitter. This time we were talking about The Death of Industrial Design. Csven laments that there is a confusion on what an Industrial Designer does, as the world sees it as styling and making beautiful things. Basically it looks like we just do shallow stuff. (Check out the post for more background information.)

Perhaps in my view, has the definition of Industrial Design changed? Perhaps we should not be called Industrial Designers? If so what should we be called?

Here is our Twitter conversation:

designsojourn: LOL The Death of Industrial Design. (I’m not mocking here.)

csven: I still like “Product Designer”, “Product Engineer”, and “Product Stylist” (in comments of post)

designsojourn: I call myself a Design Producer. Don’t you think that is more apt? We can produce anything. Tangible and intangible!

csven: Confusing I think; “design” as a noun. To me it’s an activity.

csven: When I hand off a “design”, I’m really handing over a solution (drawing, 3D file, model). Product also tangible/intangible.

designsojourn: I’m looking at it as a means to an end. Solution is the end. Means? The process and as a producer we are masters of the process.

csven: so you “produce” a process (e.g. “walk producer”). Fine. But does that not further confuse the definition of “design”?

designsojourn: Perhaps. But it implies a means to an end. Design is less emphasized. Though I do use design strategy, thinking, n problem solving.

What do you guys think? Are we Producers of solutions, ideas and beautiful things? Should we call ourselves Design Producers, and are our roles just like the Producers in film and media?

Check out some of my other thoughts on this issue as well:
1) The future of the Industrial Design Discipline
2) Starck says Design is Dead, yet Again?