Comments on: Hands on the $100 Laptop http://www.designsojourn.com/hands-on-the-100-laptop/ Good Design and Clever Products Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:34:26 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: ?????? ????????? http://www.designsojourn.com/hands-on-the-100-laptop/comment-page-1/#comment-64251 ?????? ????????? Sun, 31 May 2009 16:52:07 +0000 http://www.designsojourn.com/index.php/2007/04/13/hands-on-the-100-laptop/#comment-64251 ? ??? ?????, ? ??? ?? ???????? ????? ??? ???? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????? :) ? ??? ?????, ? ??? ?? ???????? ????? ??? ???? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????? :)

]]> By: Getting Inside Design Strategies with Hartmut Esslinger « Internet Turnkey Websites http://www.designsojourn.com/hands-on-the-100-laptop/comment-page-1/#comment-64107 Getting Inside Design Strategies with Hartmut Esslinger « Internet Turnkey Websites Fri, 08 May 2009 01:04:57 +0000 http://www.designsojourn.com/index.php/2007/04/13/hands-on-the-100-laptop/#comment-64107 [...] mouth”, why there was a limited success with the $100 Laptop Project. This pretty much echos my views I have shared in the [...] [...] mouth”, why there was a limited success with the $100 Laptop Project. This pretty much echos my views I have shared in the [...]

]]> By: Design Sojourn | Industrial Design + Entrepreneurship » Topic » Yves Behar on Design in 2012 http://www.designsojourn.com/hands-on-the-100-laptop/comment-page-1/#comment-52417 Design Sojourn | Industrial Design + Entrepreneurship » Topic » Yves Behar on Design in 2012 Sat, 01 Sep 2007 04:07:44 +0000 http://www.designsojourn.com/index.php/2007/04/13/hands-on-the-100-laptop/#comment-52417 [...] This is an interesting presentation by Yves Behar from Fuse Project on designing in the near future. He talks about his work with Swarovski, his controversial Leaf Lamp with Herman Miller and the One Laptop Per Child project (my favorite discussion topic!) [...] [...] This is an interesting presentation by Yves Behar from Fuse Project on designing in the near future. He talks about his work with Swarovski, his controversial Leaf Lamp with Herman Miller and the One Laptop Per Child project (my favorite discussion topic!) [...]

]]> By: Design Sojourn | writings on Industrial Design + Entrepreneurship » Topic » Yves Béhar on Design in 2012 http://www.designsojourn.com/hands-on-the-100-laptop/comment-page-1/#comment-45657 Design Sojourn | writings on Industrial Design + Entrepreneurship » Topic » Yves Béhar on Design in 2012 Thu, 24 May 2007 06:02:33 +0000 http://www.designsojourn.com/index.php/2007/04/13/hands-on-the-100-laptop/#comment-45657 [...] This is an interesting presentation by Yves Behar from Fuse Project on designing in the near future. He talks about his work with Swarovski, his controversial Leaf Lamp with Herman Miller and the One Laptop Per Child project (my favorite discussion topic!) [...] [...] This is an interesting presentation by Yves Behar from Fuse Project on designing in the near future. He talks about his work with Swarovski, his controversial Leaf Lamp with Herman Miller and the One Laptop Per Child project (my favorite discussion topic!) [...]

]]> By: Design Translator http://www.designsojourn.com/hands-on-the-100-laptop/comment-page-1/#comment-35043 Design Translator Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:42:02 +0000 http://www.designsojourn.com/index.php/2007/04/13/hands-on-the-100-laptop/#comment-35043 Hi Wayan, Thanks for stopping by. I don’t blame them. MIT has always believed that they should only focused on technology, and are never shy about it. They would then work closely with "sponsors" and give them un-exclusive rights to their patents. This way the companies involved are responsible for realizing and commercializing the technology and turn it into products. So I was surprised that they took the plunge and went into product development. Also from what I understood there were many companies involved in the product design and development. IDEO for one if memory serves. But the implementation problems, for a product of such magnitude mean its likely design by committee. Hi Wayan,

Thanks for stopping by. I don’t blame them. MIT has always believed that they should only focused on technology, and are never shy about it. They would then work closely with “sponsors” and give them un-exclusive rights to their patents.

This way the companies involved are responsible for realizing and commercializing the technology and turn it into products. So I was surprised that they took the plunge and went into product development.

Also from what I understood there were many companies involved in the product design and development. IDEO for one if memory serves. But the implementation problems, for a product of such magnitude mean its likely design by committee.

]]>