<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why can&#8217;t Everyone be like Apple and Other Nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designsojourn.com/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designsojourn.com/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/</link>
	<description>Good Design and Clever Products</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:34:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another reason to use a Mac &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://www.designsojourn.com/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-62747</link>
		<dc:creator>Another reason to use a Mac &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designsojourn.com/2008/02/11/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/#comment-62747</guid>
		<description>[...] Why can&#8217;t Everyone be like Apple and Other Nonsense     Posted in choices. Tags: Apple, David Pogue, iPhone, Macintosh, New York Times, your life record. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why can&#8217;t Everyone be like Apple and Other Nonsense     Posted in choices. Tags: Apple, David Pogue, iPhone, Macintosh, New York Times, your life record. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rait</title>
		<link>http://www.designsojourn.com/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-60477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designsojourn.com/2008/02/11/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/#comment-60477</guid>
		<description>We might find Alice Rawsthorn&#039;s articles useful to challenge our thinking, especially this one: http://snipurl.com/2eztd  [www_iht_com]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We might find Alice Rawsthorn&#8217;s articles useful to challenge our thinking, especially this one: <a href="http://snipurl.com/2eztd" rel="nofollow">http://snipurl.com/2eztd</a>  [www_iht_com]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DT</title>
		<link>http://www.designsojourn.com/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-57208</link>
		<dc:creator>DT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designsojourn.com/2008/02/11/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/#comment-57208</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,

I fully agree with you, that the industry seems to be heading all wrong, and personally I feel the main reason is because the people in decision making positions do not understand what it takes to create a successful product.  

Often antiquated product development processes such as OEM (etc.) or manufacturing mindsets just do not cut it these days.  Rest assured though, I can tell you that the trend is heading in the other direction, as it is getting very much harder to create a good product as many other companies are creating offerings that &quot;get it&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>I fully agree with you, that the industry seems to be heading all wrong, and personally I feel the main reason is because the people in decision making positions do not understand what it takes to create a successful product.  </p>
<p>Often antiquated product development processes such as OEM (etc.) or manufacturing mindsets just do not cut it these days.  Rest assured though, I can tell you that the trend is heading in the other direction, as it is getting very much harder to create a good product as many other companies are creating offerings that &#8220;get it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.designsojourn.com/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-57207</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designsojourn.com/2008/02/11/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/#comment-57207</guid>
		<description>Hi DT, I have taken a 2nd look at Pogue&#039;s article and acknowledge your point. He&#039;s definitely empty in just adding the few points to be considered and discrediting the works of all professions involved in the development of products. But I still adhere to my point of how disfunctional this industry has become due to this need to differentiate. I do not understand why companies set out to create ugly design due to this price differentiation stategy. I&#039;m not sure if you do get my point. From handphones to cars, companies had so often created second rate products as they have a higher range products that they want to sell.

&quot;Though the reality is these days that there is nothing we really need.&quot;

If you meant need in the sense that you cannot survive without it then maybe you are right.  However this world is changing, people are not living in the era where they can live with marrying someone they do not even know existed. Some dudes i know can&#039;t live without music. But I jibe with ur expanded point on &quot;a good product not only creates wants but satisfies the needs that arise from there&quot;. But is differentiating such an important need for consumers so much so they actually compromises on ease of use etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi DT, I have taken a 2nd look at Pogue&#8217;s article and acknowledge your point. He&#8217;s definitely empty in just adding the few points to be considered and discrediting the works of all professions involved in the development of products. But I still adhere to my point of how disfunctional this industry has become due to this need to differentiate. I do not understand why companies set out to create ugly design due to this price differentiation stategy. I&#8217;m not sure if you do get my point. From handphones to cars, companies had so often created second rate products as they have a higher range products that they want to sell.</p>
<p>&#8220;Though the reality is these days that there is nothing we really need.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you meant need in the sense that you cannot survive without it then maybe you are right.  However this world is changing, people are not living in the era where they can live with marrying someone they do not even know existed. Some dudes i know can&#8217;t live without music. But I jibe with ur expanded point on &#8220;a good product not only creates wants but satisfies the needs that arise from there&#8221;. But is differentiating such an important need for consumers so much so they actually compromises on ease of use etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rait</title>
		<link>http://www.designsojourn.com/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-57205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designsojourn.com/2008/02/11/why-cant-everyone-be-like-apple-and-other-nonsense/#comment-57205</guid>
		<description>and ... there were many articles like Pogue&#039;s about the iPod too.. the interesting difference being that the &#039;device&#039; lived in an easy to use system so the &quot;early adopter&quot; consumer was really happy.. in the photoframe case... and I have been looking for one myself... there is no operational merit (White and Graham&#039;s 4 merits: inventive merit, embodiment merit, market merit, and operational merit)to attract the potential consumers (including me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and &#8230; there were many articles like Pogue&#8217;s about the iPod too.. the interesting difference being that the &#8216;device&#8217; lived in an easy to use system so the &#8220;early adopter&#8221; consumer was really happy.. in the photoframe case&#8230; and I have been looking for one myself&#8230; there is no operational merit (White and Graham&#8217;s 4 merits: inventive merit, embodiment merit, market merit, and operational merit)to attract the potential consumers (including me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
